Thermal Grizzly - KryoSheet (24x12x0,2mm) - Graphene Thermal Pads - Highest Thermal Conductivity - Alternative to High Performance Thermal Paste CPU/GPU/PS4/PS5/Xbox

Product Information

They are intended to work anywhere thermal paste or pads are currently used, for instance in their review TPU tested the Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet on an ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX, with a 475W TDP. I do not think it functions properly under a delidded and resealed IHS--I would ONLY use liquid metal for relidding for very obvious reasons. But if vertical and back mounted cooler or server this wouldn't be so easy to use unless you added a dab of thermal paste/. I only recently started using them for my very low cost hardware benching because I got sick of wasting so much thermal grease when changing out parts.

KryoSheet contains no liquid components and is therefore not subject to normal ageing as is the case with traditional thermal pastes. This 29mm x 25mm edition thermal pad is designed for use with a range of devices such as CPUs, GPUs, active cooling systems and much more. You will still have a functional CPU decades later or until Redmond releases another failed OS update. As a side effect of this complex manufacturing process, however, the electrical conductivity is also increased and the stability of the KryoSheet pads is affected, so that the pads are only to be used according to the instructions!Compared to Carbonaut pads, KryoSheet as a high-end product offers significantly higher thermal conductivity. I plan to test Kyrosheet in the near future on a 5950X (that I hate taking apart for yearly paste replacements) to see how it performs.

Since the pads do not have to be replaced at regular intervals like thermal paste, there is no need for time-consuming maintenance. However, as a side effect of this complex manufacturing process, the electrical conductivity is also increased and the stability of the KryoSheet pads is influenced, so that the pads should only be used according to instructions! KryoSheet does not contain any liquid components and is therefore not subject to normal ageing as is the case with traditional thermal paste.

In the case of an Intel desktop CPU (socket 115x, 1200) with a heat spreader (IHS) size of 32 x 32 mm, the KryoSheet with a size of 33 x 33 mm should be selected. What matters more is how well it cools, if it's easy to apply, etc, which is exactly what I'll be looking at in this review. Liquid Metal is top but it kinda bonds on the top layer of the cpu IHS and it’s like impossible to clean without removing also the lettering which makes selling the cpu way more difficult. The graphene thermal pads of the Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet series can be used as an excellent alternative for thermal compounds from the higher performance segment. I also used TG-PP10 under the Poseidons' larger monoblock heatsink which covers some IC's and the RAM, tested with a thermal probe before/after, and RAM temps are lower as well.

I have been using this on my 4090 for 6 months with amazing results -- the PTM Sheet that came OEM developed a bald spot and i had a 30C delta on hotspot vs core with fans at max ramp, now I can't hear it anymore while gaming. CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | Motherboard: MSI B350M Mortar Arctic | GPU: MSI GTX 1070 ARMOR OC | RAM: G. I'd be curious if you lapped the cpu/cooler if the results would have been more in line with other results I've seen.

Any laptop users (aside from the new Recoil chassis that use liquid metal), I would strongly recommend purchasing one of these.

Compared to Carbonaut pads, KryoSheet offers a significantly higher thermal conductivity as a high-end product. The Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet series of graphene thermal pads can be used as an excellent alternative to thermal compounds in the high-performance segment. Credit is provided by Novuna Personal Finance, a trading style of Mitsubishi HC Capital (UK) PLC, authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Specs: Phantek's Enthoo Pro Full Tower case * Gigabyte Z690 Gaming X DDR4 motherboard * Intel i9-13900KS CPU with Kraken X63 AIO * WIN 11 PRO 64bit * MSI 4070 Ti Gaming X Trio GPU * Corsair Vengeance 64GB(4x16GB) RAM * Solidigm P44 Pro 2TB M. A few years ago, Thermal Grizzly released Carbonaut which was a tiny carbon sheet with the idea it could replace paste.

I watched a video and it seems comparable to the Kryonaut , just 1-2c warmer so I don’t believe it’s going to be better in that term. This will be especially noteworthy to all you laptop users out there struggling with high temps on the CPU. Yes it indeed can, since it's commonly used on laptop (which are direct die always now) CPU's and various GPU's and APU chips (Steam Deck, ROG Ally, etc). I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on the thermal difference between KRYOSHEET and a traditional paste in a GPU application.